SESSION 1999
ANGLAIS
| Durée : 3 heures |
Coefficient : 2 |
| Dictionnaire bilingue autorisé. |
| L'usage de la calculatrice est interdit. |
SECRETARIAL
Unhappy at work? Maybe the company's too big
The key to job sastisfaction is working in the right size of firm for you. By Kate Hilpern
|
Julie Duguy, 42, is PA to the chief executive of Reed Business Information, an organisation that employs over 2,500 staff. She has experience of working in both small and large companies. "I once worked for a small company that went under. Not only did I have to live with that fear day in and day out, but I also had to make sacrifices, like not getting paid when I was ill. It's an experience I'd never want to repeat. Here, however, there's an in-house nurse, a visiting physiotherapist and a share option scheme - just to name a few of the support systems. If I have any worries about anything, I can make use of the relevant policies without which I think all employees are vulnerable. I think the main problem of large businesses comes if you're not at the top. Because I am, I get to see the goals and ambitions and whether they are achieved - but that isn't always the case in a large organisation. [...]" |
When you join a company, its size is an obvious factor. Has it an international reputation? Is it financially secure enough to ensure decent salaries for its employees? What perks can if offer?
But have you really considered what is might be like, day-to-day, to work in a small, independent company employing a couple of dozen, as opposed to a global corporation, housed in fabulous offices and with a workforce numbering thousands?
According to Umist's* latest Institute of Management survey, company size is a major influence on how happy you are in your job. Professor Cary Cooper, from Umist, believes small is beautiful.
"We found that people who work for small companies feel much more loyalty, motivation and, above all, job security," explains Cooper. "Big companies, such as plcs and public sector organisations, tend to have much lower morale among their workers." In fact, claims the study, these perceptions contain more than a grain of truth: "Generally speaking, the smaller the organisation, the bigger your role as an individual, and the more you'd be missed if you were absent."
Julie Fisher, a freelance PA, agrees: "When I have worked in small businesses - especially family-run ones - I've found my daily tasks are more multi-skilled and I am therefore far more valuable. But working for compannies that have several hundred employees, I have an intrinsic feeling of anonymity. Sometimes, it doesn't even seem to make much of a difference to my workoad or to my colleagues if I am off sick, with the result that I have less motivation about what I am doing when I am there."
But what about opportunities for promotion and pay increases? Surely, the larger the business, the clearer the structure? Not so, claims Cooper. "Our research shows that in a company of fewer than 50 people, employers can see what their employees are delivering and reward them accordingly. In big companies, there may be yearly appraisals, but they are not necessarily fair. In fact, we've found that big companies are more likely to work a punishment system than a reward system." [...]
"Also, inflexible structures can mean it takes longer to work your way up. In a small company, with the right abilities and enthusisasm, you can often prove yourself enough to go straight to the top."
Even Cooper, however, is forced to admit that larger companies offer more in the way of opportunities for moving around geographically, as well as more reasonable working hours. Discrimination is also less likely - something that Sophia Lawrence, a secretarial temp, knows all too well. "Being Afro-Caribbean, I've had my fair share of racism in the workplace, and I have definitely noticed family-run businesses let it happen more often. You know, for instance, that if you work for the National Health System, or a multinational bank, there are clear equal opportunity systems in place and that means colleagues just can't get away with snide comments.
"But if all you can do is go to your manager's father - as the boss, - to complain about him, you really haven't got much hope of getting anything done about it."
Dr Paul Taffinder, a chartered psychologist, agrees that size counts for a great deal, but he claims the issue is not always as simple as it appears. "What is critical is the size of the group that one works in, rather than the overall size of the company. That's why many of the biggest companies in the world ensure that individual offices do not exceed certain numbers of staff." [...]
*Umist = University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology.
THE WEDNESDAY REVIEW
The Independent 5 August 1998
I - COMPRÉHENSION
Rédigez en anglais un compte-rendu (220 mots +/- 10 %) du document page 2 (NDR : "Unhappy at work?) et indiquez le nombre de mots utilisés.
II - VERSION
Traduisez en français le paragraphe 7 : "But what about opportunities ... reward system".
III - EXPRESSION ÉCRITE
Rédigez un courrier en anglais selon les consignes suivantes :
Vous vous appelez Sabrina THIBAULT et vous habitez 6 Garden Close, Beaconsfield, Bucks HP6 3RT.
Vous êtes secrétaire dans une petite entreprise anglaise (Larch and Co., 69 Foster Road, Beaconsfield, Bucks HP6 3MY).
Après quatre années passées dans cette entreprise, vous avez trouvé un emploi dans une firme plus importante. Vous écrivez donc une lettre de démission à M. GRAY, directeur général :
Utilisez les formules d'usage et respectez les normes de présentation en vigueur.
Barème de notation
| COMPRÉHENSION | 14 points |
| VERSION | 8 points |
| EXPRESSION ÉCRITE | 18 points |
| TOTAL | 40 points |